Just finished watching "Paranormal Incident" which has a 2.5 on IMDb. "The infamous Odenbrook Sanitarium closed after a mass suicide occurred within its walls. Sixty years later..." That's the tagline. Basic plot, a handful of college students go to spend the weekend in this supposedly haunted sanitarium ostensibly for some final project in a class. I am not sure what class they are taking, but I wish they'd had it as an elective where I went. I would have loved to do some ghost hunting for credit. Anyway, there's a framing story that is poorly written, badly acted, and ultimately attempts to turn the movie into something bigger than it is. The setup otherwise is simple, a little cliched, but the found footage scenes (more on some problems there later) are occasionally quite good, getting some tension going with what are otherwise very familiar shots to anyone who has seen even one episode of Ghost Hunters. In some (and only some) of these scenes, the acting is even quite good, nothing to win awards but far better than a small budget horror film might sometimes get... and some of the worst that comes from such a low budget as far as acting goes is on display in the framing sequence. In other scenes, especially as the movie goes on, the acting is subpar, and some actors who seem promising early on sound like they are reading brand new script pages in other scenes.
The movie is also inconsistent in its direction. Again, the framing sequence--which involves the one survivor viewing the found footage with a woman who may or may not be law enforcement--is poorly directed... I would wonder if the film was just too short so this sequence was added later except the character involved would have no reason to be absent for so much of the rest of the movie if this wasn't part of the original script. Anyway, a lot of the investigation scenes are put together pretty well. There are attempts to insert flashes of things that aren't there which come across as creepy at first, a little interesting, then the more they happen, especially late in the film, they seem desperate, like the director didn't know he was doing a pretty good job with the scary bits otherwise. Now, once the scares become more explicit, visible ghosts rather than doors slamming for example, the directing seems lazier and a few shots seem to almost have entirely new color schemes and cinematography--yes, I'm talking about cinemtography and color schemes with a low budget horror film.
Regarding the actual content of the plot, there are some problems, but overall it works. It's generic and cliched, but it works. But, there are some holes. Notably, the found footage was supposed to be edited by the guy in charge who was absent from the action. He's in a hospital--SPOILERS AHEAD, not that it matters much--or thinks he is, has NOT seen any of the footage so certainly could not have edited it. And, if any of the supposed law enforcement had edited the tapes they would already have seen the ghosts and whatnot and know that this guy was not guilty of killing his friends, which is why they are questioning him... of course, given the way the framing sequence ends, with them killing him apparently because he saw the devil and knows there's actual paranormal stuff going on at the sanitarium, maybe they already did watch all the footage and edited it to jog his memory... except, why jog his memory if you want him NOT to remember anything? Why pretend to accuse him of murder if you know he didn't commit it? Why have this sequence at all when it fails to make this movie into something that is uniquely clever or that stands out from a crowd of similarly plotted films? I found it while browsing Netflix for a crappy horror film to watch--and it was better than I expect, at least when it bothered to be good--and it currently has only 35 ratings on IMDb. This movie has no real selling point to get attention. I get that it needs some hook to grab an audience. But, it isn't sold on the hook of the framing story. It is sold on the mass suicide history, which though mentioned in context of the story is absolutely unimportant as far as the plot goes.
Still, for a supernatural slasher type film, this movie is not half bad. In fact, it's only about 20% bad. The other 80% is good, at least for this type of movie. Biggest complaint is the lameness of the framing sequence. Also, the inconsistency of the directing, including use of shots that are obviously not from the any of the handheld cameras or hospital cameras but are cut right in with them nonetheless... District 9 got away with mixing documentary style footage with straight movie footage, but this is NOT that. This is lazy editing, lazy directing, with the occasionally good scene. I certainly didn't regret watching it.
No comments:
Post a Comment